Age?
- 19
Sex?
- Female
What is your degree subject (both if joint)?
- English and Creative and Professional Writing.
Does ‘Being Bad’ relate well to the other modules you are taking?
- Not really, but I find it a breath of fresh air from them.
If so, how? And if not, why not?
- The other modules I take are Writing For Children, The Story Of English and Film - Storytelling and Adaptation. The ones I enjoy the most are Being Bad and Film - Storytelling and Adaptation. ‘Being Bad’ doesn’t really relate to my other modules, except maybe the film module in a minor way. It is more up-to-date and thought provoking. The things we talk about in ‘Being Bad’ do not come up in my other modules though. Have you found ‘Being Bad’ too demanding, too easy, or at an appropriate level?
- I think it was an appropriate level. The lectures and assignments worked well together.
Do you think the list of topics covered on the module was appropriate?
- Yes. They were all to do with aspects of ‘Being Bad’ in our society and perfect for the module.
Are there any topics not included in the module that you would like to see included?
- I think the ones covered where fine, but if you were expanding, maybe things like bullying and racism. As these are things we have all been through and can relate to.
Do you think that the format for classes has worked well?
- Yes. Although I think other people in the class didn’t like the class being in the evening as they kept leaving which I found extremely rude and disrespectful to the teacher. I always stayed to the end.
What did you think of the module team?
- I think it was a little confusing having a different teacher for every lesson. It didn’t bother me that much, but I prefer to have a consistent teacher so I can ask questions confidently.
Do you think it would have been better to have had more:
Small group discussions?
Discussion and debate among the class as a whole?
Information and talk from lecturers?
- I think all the above were dealt with well in the classes.
The approach taken in the module is interdisciplinary (drawing on perspectives from English Literature, Film Studies, Creative Writing, Philosophy, Religious Studies, Media Studies and Politics): do you think this a useful way of approaching the topics covered in the module?
- Yes.
Do you think that interdisciplinary modules are a good idea?
- Yes.
Do you think you have benefited from the interdisciplinary approach taken in the module?
- Yes. It’s made it more insightful and well rounded.
Would you like to see more modules that cover this kind of subject matter?
- Yes. It’s nice to combine aspects 0f different modules.
Are you planning to take the follow-up module PH2004 ‘It Shouldn’t Be Allowed’ at level 2?
- Haven’t decided yet, but if it’s like this one I’ll definitely consider it.
Would you recommend ‘Being Bad’ to a friend?
- Definitely
Do you think that the blogs (web logs) were a good idea?
- I enjoyed doing them, but there were to many rules to abide to for them. I agree you shouldn’t let people do all blogs the day before, but two or three a day should be allowed. (I’m being biased though, because as I haven’t got the Internet at home I had to go the library every time I needed to do one)
What did you think of the other assessments (e.g. would it be better to have one longer assessment rather than two shorter ones?)?
- No, I think two short ones were better because there were a lot of topics covered and this gave people a chance to comment on two.
What have you learned from the module?
- I knew a bit about all topics covered, but this module has given me a lot more information on them and I’ve found out a lot of interesting things. They are things you talk about when you’re discussing issues with friends. What parts of the module have you found most useful and why?
- I liked all the extra information I obtained on topics I thought I knew about. I also liked hearing other people views on topics I felt strongly about.
What parts do you think were a waste of time and why?
- I enjoyed the classes, so if I have to put something down here it will have to be parts of the blog. We needed to do twenty for an A. Maybe this should be put down a bit, as there were only twelve classes.
Are there any other comments you wish to make regarding ‘Being Bad’?
- Thank you for an interesting learning experience.
Thursday 10 May 2007
Wednesday 9 May 2007
Comedians
Being someone who loves comedians i was looking forward to this lecture. I found it very interesting and insightful. I don't like comedians who make jokes on purpose to single out certain people. I just don't think its nessesary. I love jokes but when a joke, for example, is racist or sexsist i just don't laugh. I don't know why some comedians do this, maybe they enjoy the publicity they get for how shocking they can be, but to me it would be a better idea to stick to whats right so in that way they appeal to a mass audience and make more money. You don't want a arena full of ten racist twats and no one else do you? Well i would have thought you woulnd't anyway. I don't know any really offensive acts becasue i usually steer clear of them but one comedian i really like is Chris Rock and he caused some trouble in the media with his act about black people. Now Chris Rock is black so it was hard for critics to know what to say (i think), but what happened was this. He has an 'bit' where he compares different types of black people (he called one side 'black people' and the other a word i'm not going to type (by the way another issue to think about is - if one minority group is making fun of it's own race is it ok?). Now this caused a thing in America, but from my point of view i think he was trying to send out a positive message. I don't agree he should have used that word, but what he is trying to do it tell non-black people that all black people are not bad. (After watching an Documenty about gun crime in America i discovered the American media portray African-Americans in an unfair light.) I just think he is trying to say, sure some do commit crimes just like other races, but not all of us do so please don't generalize. That's my reading although i watched his show a while back now but from watching his TV show 'everybody hates Chris' recently i think my thoughts are around the right area.
We also talked about comedians swearing. Now swearing has become the 'norm' nowadays but when you hear a swear word in a joke i think it's the icing on the cake. Mainly becasue it's a taboo (suprisingly) it tops of a joke well and almost solidifys a laugh. The funny thing about swearing is - we don't mind saying it but if someone swears at us its shocking! Am i right? I swear all the time (well i'm not that bad) but when i heard my little sister repeat a swear word from the TV i was shocked and told her off. Swearing for comedians exagerates a joke though and that always gets a laugh.
If your looking for some good comedians (hopefully not nasty ones) in the UK this site is a good one for telling you who's playing and when - http://www.chortle.co.uk/comics/a/
Friday 4 May 2007
Smoking!!
Well let me state the obvious – Smoking is bad. Yes, we all know that, but then why oh why do people do it??? Especially now when the sighs about it are everywhere. Those smoking adverts are frankly chilling and on nearly every billboard there’s an unsettling picture of someone suffering because of smoking. So is it cool? Well that is what most people think. Smoking has been seen as ‘cool’ for a very long time now. All the old movies feature smoking and all the old TV shows. It’s very uncommon for the ‘cool’ guy or girl in a movie not to be smoking is it? Okay so maybe that guy in the movie does look attractive with it. Note I said looks – what about all the others things smoking does. You can’t smell it on TV can you? If you’re not a smoker and someone is smoking nearby it is sooooo annoying. It smells, it gives you a headache and it makes you, the non-smoker, breathe in the smoke. Also you can’t see the insides of his body can you? Now I’ve seen the effects so much on TV etc smoking had definitely lost his allure. I just don’t know how these people start. I know quiet a few people who smoke. Most of them say it was a social thing. They started because everyone was doing it when they went out and they just…started…magically. Most people want to stop. Well they say they do, or is that just to shut me up? But it’s too hard! That’s what they all say. Okay I agree it must be hard as it’s an addiction, but if you do really want to do it – you can. I know people who have given up too and it was only because they really REALLY wanted too.It’s really up to you. You can’t stop people in the media making it seem cool, but you can do something by not smoking and being around people who don’t smoke. Think of the white teeth and clean fingernails.
Here's a good site that tells you the reasons why to stop and how you can do it - http:/www.bupa.co.uk/health_information/asp/healthy_living/lifestyle/smoking/
Here's a good site that tells you the reasons why to stop and how you can do it - http:/www.bupa.co.uk/health_information/asp/healthy_living/lifestyle/smoking/
Thursday 3 May 2007
Being to religious
In this day and age religion seems to have taken a backseat in many of our lives and this is mainly down to the lifestyles we lead. Before technology religion was a given and you prayed to the God you were brought up knowing and obeyed his rules. But now, in this three-minute culture, people don’t have time to visit holy buildings and obey rules. As time has gone on the world has become more competitive and taking hold of your own life seemed to be stressful enough without extra commitments. To be honest I couldn’t tell you why people stop believing in God. Maybe it’s because of the world we live in. Maybe they ask themselves if there was a God why does he let all the pain and suffering go on in the world? It’s really down to the individual and their experiences. Then again I couldn’t tell you why some people have excessive religious behaviour. Again it is down to that person.In my opinion I don’t mind what you believe in. You could be any religion under the sun and I wouldn’t hold it against you. When I make friends I only care if they are a nice person. Problems arise when people are too openly excessive in their beliefs. If someone believes in something that’s fine. More power to you. But when people make it abundantly clear that you are WRONG if you don’t agree with them, that’s when problems occur. I don’t understand why people feel it necessary to force their beliefs on you. If God made all of us isn’t he watching over all of us no matter what we believe in? Religion should be open. You shouldn’t have to undergo tests or anything you should just be able to believe what you want to.If a friend of mine joined a cult I must admit I would worry. If they suddenly started changing their lifestyle and stopped talking to me for example I would be very concerned. I’d have to have a deep conversation with them and find out firstly if they are really happy and secondly if it is healthy. Let’s hope that never happens though ay.
Here is an eye opening site about extremists - http://www.meta-religion.com/Extremism/extremism.htm
Wednesday 2 May 2007
Body Modification
This lesson really did teach me something about this subject. Before hand I just thought tattoos were cool. I never knew such history was behind them. And piercing? Well I was never really to keen on them anyway because I happen to be allergic to pain (except my ear piercing and that’s only because I was young when I had that done) but the extent to which some go to with this art is shocking. Of course it all does come down to freedom of choice and if you want a tattoo or piercing you can have one. It’s your body.In don’t have a problem with people who have tattoos or piercing. It’s their choice. But with some forms (like the particularly hardcore ones we saw in the lecture) you do wonder the question ‘why?’ Some people go to extreme and painful lengths and the process is shocking to witness, but again, it’s their body not yours so are we allowed to pass judgement?When it comes to things like plastic surgery I tend to hold the opinion ‘why can’t people just be happy with what God gave them?’ I do find it vain but again, I’m sounding like a broken record I know, it’s their body so let them. However sometimes, like the extreme piercing we saw, it becomes a kind of addiction. People do want to see how many they can have etc.I think fashion does play a huge part in body modification. Today’s body modification anyway. We seem to be hitting a ‘no holds barred’ in this area with people using technology to push boundaries. All I can say it ‘it’s your choice.’For a good site about tattoo designs got to - http://www.tattoofashion.com/
Reply to Mandeep Dhillon
What Mandeep said -
I think a person can only be called a prostitute if she or he takes money from someone and then provides sex. Someone who takes money from but doesn’t provide sex shouldn’t be called a prostitute because; she or he didn’t have the intention to present sex. However he or she can be seen as a thief as the money was handed over, but didn’t supply what the “customer” wanted. This I think is at the same level as socially unacceptable, as the “prostitutes” still have the intention to be paid for sex.
My Response -
I agree with the statement that you can only call a person a prostitute is they take money for sex. If someone gives the inkiling they will 'put out' for money it is not prostitusion, it is conning. They are conning that person and the person is falling for it.
I agree they are theifs but not prostitutes. Stealing and selling your body are two completly different things. They are both wrong but very different.
The extract we wacthed was an example of conning. This form of being bad depends on the person you're connings gulability. It is kind of their fault for assuming the girl is going to be a whore. It is there choice to hand over the money. She dosen't have a gun to his head. I guess it's the basic 'a women abusing her power over a man'. Make a man think he'll get sex and he'll do anything.
I think a person can only be called a prostitute if she or he takes money from someone and then provides sex. Someone who takes money from but doesn’t provide sex shouldn’t be called a prostitute because; she or he didn’t have the intention to present sex. However he or she can be seen as a thief as the money was handed over, but didn’t supply what the “customer” wanted. This I think is at the same level as socially unacceptable, as the “prostitutes” still have the intention to be paid for sex.
My Response -
I agree with the statement that you can only call a person a prostitute is they take money for sex. If someone gives the inkiling they will 'put out' for money it is not prostitusion, it is conning. They are conning that person and the person is falling for it.
I agree they are theifs but not prostitutes. Stealing and selling your body are two completly different things. They are both wrong but very different.
The extract we wacthed was an example of conning. This form of being bad depends on the person you're connings gulability. It is kind of their fault for assuming the girl is going to be a whore. It is there choice to hand over the money. She dosen't have a gun to his head. I guess it's the basic 'a women abusing her power over a man'. Make a man think he'll get sex and he'll do anything.
Monday 30 April 2007
Reply to Andrew Heaton (Hied)
What Andrew said -
Well for some people, it gives them a fucking huge stiffy.The PG version of that above sentence reads: It excites people and makes them feel alive.Why people do it is subjective. But the obvious answer to this question is that if the opportunity arises for one to steal something chances are most people will take that chance. With on-the-spot fines / punishments being carried out it seems that shoplifting has a more lenient attitude. So have at that George summer blouse and those bottles of Irish Knights!Another reason people do it is they could see it as a form of anarchy. To be honest I have yet to come across any scenario whereby a young juvenile has dashed out of a local Tesco supermarket with a bottle of gin cradled under their bomber jacket screaming at the top of their lungs "Down with the establishment!"I think the whole anarchy side of shop-lifting is a ploy. Face it, you wanna get wasted on cider and copydex that you just couldn't be arsed to pay for...
My Response -
Yeah i agree. People do do it for that feeling. It excites them and makes them feel like they've 'got one over' on that shop or something stupid like that. Although i have to admit when i was little and i'd get pic 'n' mix, if i managed to steal one i felt like i was sooo cool.
But to be honest i think it's stupid to steal things. Maybe that's becasue i have a stupid thing called guilt inside of me. Some people don't give a damn. To them it's no big deal.
To comment on your disbelief of the anarchy theory, you've made me agree. You're right. No one runs out of tesco with stolen drink and says 'this was to fight the good fight'. I think when people say that they mean they did it to rebel. I don't know what against. The growth in prices? "That was only a pound last week and now it's £1.10! The madness" or possibily their parents or someting. Kids get in trouble just to get caught so their parents notice them. Then again it can just fall to the age old -i coulnd't be bothered to pay for it. Yes, i think that is the route of all stealing. Unless someone can't afford food. Then i think it's okay for them to steal. It's not fun to be hungry.
Well for some people, it gives them a fucking huge stiffy.The PG version of that above sentence reads: It excites people and makes them feel alive.Why people do it is subjective. But the obvious answer to this question is that if the opportunity arises for one to steal something chances are most people will take that chance. With on-the-spot fines / punishments being carried out it seems that shoplifting has a more lenient attitude. So have at that George summer blouse and those bottles of Irish Knights!Another reason people do it is they could see it as a form of anarchy. To be honest I have yet to come across any scenario whereby a young juvenile has dashed out of a local Tesco supermarket with a bottle of gin cradled under their bomber jacket screaming at the top of their lungs "Down with the establishment!"I think the whole anarchy side of shop-lifting is a ploy. Face it, you wanna get wasted on cider and copydex that you just couldn't be arsed to pay for...
My Response -
Yeah i agree. People do do it for that feeling. It excites them and makes them feel like they've 'got one over' on that shop or something stupid like that. Although i have to admit when i was little and i'd get pic 'n' mix, if i managed to steal one i felt like i was sooo cool.
But to be honest i think it's stupid to steal things. Maybe that's becasue i have a stupid thing called guilt inside of me. Some people don't give a damn. To them it's no big deal.
To comment on your disbelief of the anarchy theory, you've made me agree. You're right. No one runs out of tesco with stolen drink and says 'this was to fight the good fight'. I think when people say that they mean they did it to rebel. I don't know what against. The growth in prices? "That was only a pound last week and now it's £1.10! The madness" or possibily their parents or someting. Kids get in trouble just to get caught so their parents notice them. Then again it can just fall to the age old -i coulnd't be bothered to pay for it. Yes, i think that is the route of all stealing. Unless someone can't afford food. Then i think it's okay for them to steal. It's not fun to be hungry.
Reply to Kathyrn Melluish
What Kathyrn said -
I don't have a problem with Tattoos or Body Piercings. I myself want a tattoo when I'm twenty-one which is in July. Though, the only problem I have with myself getting a tattoo is what to get and what will it look like when I'm older. I might just get a celtic band around my arm or a tiger on my shoulder. My mom has a problem with it, she doesn't like them. Neither does my dad. But my mom wants her nose pierced. I did once fancy having my eyebrow done, but I grew out of wanting that.Some tattoos can be really good, but I think some people just go excessive. Specially those who are covered head to toe in tattoos. They get a bit disgusting. What's even more sick, is the rude piercing's you can get. Nipple piercings, clit piercing, penis piercings. They're just going too far.
My Response -
I agree. I don't have a problem with tatoos or anything like that either. Yes, i did contemplate having one to, but then i realized it might hurt and i decided to think about it for a much longer time. I do think they look good but i agree about what you said about moderation. It must be in moderation. It just goes to far when people get them all over their bodies. Personally i think if you're covered in them it isn't very attractive. My mum is 'oh you shouldn't because you'll get it and them regret it - it's for life' like yours. I wanted to get the red hot chili pepper star on my arm but she was like what if you don't like them one day. I don't see that ever happening but it did make me think. I hate when mums do that. I don't know. It's somthing i'll have to REALLY want if i do do it when i can. I agree about not liking the wierd and rude piercings. They are a bit too far aren't they. That is a deffo no no for me.
I don't have a problem with Tattoos or Body Piercings. I myself want a tattoo when I'm twenty-one which is in July. Though, the only problem I have with myself getting a tattoo is what to get and what will it look like when I'm older. I might just get a celtic band around my arm or a tiger on my shoulder. My mom has a problem with it, she doesn't like them. Neither does my dad. But my mom wants her nose pierced. I did once fancy having my eyebrow done, but I grew out of wanting that.Some tattoos can be really good, but I think some people just go excessive. Specially those who are covered head to toe in tattoos. They get a bit disgusting. What's even more sick, is the rude piercing's you can get. Nipple piercings, clit piercing, penis piercings. They're just going too far.
My Response -
I agree. I don't have a problem with tatoos or anything like that either. Yes, i did contemplate having one to, but then i realized it might hurt and i decided to think about it for a much longer time. I do think they look good but i agree about what you said about moderation. It must be in moderation. It just goes to far when people get them all over their bodies. Personally i think if you're covered in them it isn't very attractive. My mum is 'oh you shouldn't because you'll get it and them regret it - it's for life' like yours. I wanted to get the red hot chili pepper star on my arm but she was like what if you don't like them one day. I don't see that ever happening but it did make me think. I hate when mums do that. I don't know. It's somthing i'll have to REALLY want if i do do it when i can. I agree about not liking the wierd and rude piercings. They are a bit too far aren't they. That is a deffo no no for me.
Gambling
Gambling is something we have all done in some way. Whether it’s been a little bet with a mate or something you’re wagering big money on. I don’t tend to gamble so it doesn’t really affect me, but I have noticed a surge in its popularity as of late.
The most common form of gambling that is enjoyed by everyone from young adults to housewives is The National Lottery. A lot of people play the lottery every week and its main form of attraction is the fact you’re only spending a pound on a ticket and you could come away with millions. My mum used to play the lottery, and she still does form time to time, but the most she’s ever won is ten pounds. This was what made her stop playing it so frequently. The truth is your chances of winning the lottery are very slim. There’s a very funny episode of ‘Friends’ where they play the lottery and they buy an obscene amount of tickets to up their chance. They end up winning three pounds on one ticket. While they’re contemplating whether to play the Lottery Ross say’s something that I think brings the chances of winning home. ‘The lottery, ha, you have a better chance of being hit by lighting 42 times’ now I know that’s in America and America is way bigger than little old England but still…
Actually winning the lottery is used with a comedy element quite often. In ‘The Simpson’s ‘Lottery Fever’ hits Springfield (eg. One man buys a wheelbarrow of tickets and they all blow away as soon as he gets out of the shop) and Homer buys fifty tickets – but doesn’t win. He used the children’s ages for some of his numbers and blames Bart on being the wrong age. Then of course there’s the popular saying ‘you have more chance of winning the lottery’
Casinos, betting shops etc are popular forms of gambling also. I’ve never been in either but seen then on TV. For example one owner of a casino in a film said this about his business, “It’s the perfect business. People come in, empty their pockets, and leave.’
Gambling can be an addiction and with the rise of Internet gambling more and more people are getting hooked onto this ‘get rich quick’ dream.
All I can say is don’t bet you’re first born. You’ll wake up and regret it.
The most common form of gambling that is enjoyed by everyone from young adults to housewives is The National Lottery. A lot of people play the lottery every week and its main form of attraction is the fact you’re only spending a pound on a ticket and you could come away with millions. My mum used to play the lottery, and she still does form time to time, but the most she’s ever won is ten pounds. This was what made her stop playing it so frequently. The truth is your chances of winning the lottery are very slim. There’s a very funny episode of ‘Friends’ where they play the lottery and they buy an obscene amount of tickets to up their chance. They end up winning three pounds on one ticket. While they’re contemplating whether to play the Lottery Ross say’s something that I think brings the chances of winning home. ‘The lottery, ha, you have a better chance of being hit by lighting 42 times’ now I know that’s in America and America is way bigger than little old England but still…
Actually winning the lottery is used with a comedy element quite often. In ‘The Simpson’s ‘Lottery Fever’ hits Springfield (eg. One man buys a wheelbarrow of tickets and they all blow away as soon as he gets out of the shop) and Homer buys fifty tickets – but doesn’t win. He used the children’s ages for some of his numbers and blames Bart on being the wrong age. Then of course there’s the popular saying ‘you have more chance of winning the lottery’
Casinos, betting shops etc are popular forms of gambling also. I’ve never been in either but seen then on TV. For example one owner of a casino in a film said this about his business, “It’s the perfect business. People come in, empty their pockets, and leave.’
Gambling can be an addiction and with the rise of Internet gambling more and more people are getting hooked onto this ‘get rich quick’ dream.
All I can say is don’t bet you’re first born. You’ll wake up and regret it.
Friday 27 April 2007
Racism
Racism is a topic I feel very strongly about. It is something that is NEVER acceptable and always frowned upon in all ways – so why does it still happen?
I have never understood what makes a person make a racist comment. Ever since I was little and realized what the term meant it baffled me. Why? It’s just skin colour. Why do people not like others just because of something as simple as their race? It amazes me. I never see a persons colour when I meet them. If they are nice to me I like them and if they are horrible to me I don’t like them. Simple. I would never make a decision on someone based on their race. To me if you are a racist person you are missing out on a lot of very nice people that you don’t like just because of the colour of their skin. What people are like is on the inside. We all bleed the same red blood. Racist people are just ignorant and small-minded.
Once I was watching a television show on racism and there was a little girl, about ten, and she told her experience of racism. She said she was taunted and bullied so badly that she could not go to school and if she did she would get beaten up. Once her mother caught her rubbing a piece of sandpaper against her arm until it started to bleed trying to change her skin colour. This made me so upset. Just imaging this little girl scraping at her arm trying to rub her colour away so she wouldn’t get bullied was chilling. I’ve always remembered that.
As the world gets more diverse and people get more tolerant I hope racism will be something that will be wiped out. Everyone is equal no matter what colour or race they are.
I have never understood what makes a person make a racist comment. Ever since I was little and realized what the term meant it baffled me. Why? It’s just skin colour. Why do people not like others just because of something as simple as their race? It amazes me. I never see a persons colour when I meet them. If they are nice to me I like them and if they are horrible to me I don’t like them. Simple. I would never make a decision on someone based on their race. To me if you are a racist person you are missing out on a lot of very nice people that you don’t like just because of the colour of their skin. What people are like is on the inside. We all bleed the same red blood. Racist people are just ignorant and small-minded.
Once I was watching a television show on racism and there was a little girl, about ten, and she told her experience of racism. She said she was taunted and bullied so badly that she could not go to school and if she did she would get beaten up. Once her mother caught her rubbing a piece of sandpaper against her arm until it started to bleed trying to change her skin colour. This made me so upset. Just imaging this little girl scraping at her arm trying to rub her colour away so she wouldn’t get bullied was chilling. I’ve always remembered that.
As the world gets more diverse and people get more tolerant I hope racism will be something that will be wiped out. Everyone is equal no matter what colour or race they are.
A good link to check out is -http://http://www.childline.org.uk/Racism.asp
Thursday 26 April 2007
Reply to Ruby Mahay
What Ruby Said-
Personally I am not a religious person, however I respect that other people are deeply religious, which is fine. However I don’t agree with preaching in streets and town, because in today’s society everybody is aware of the different religions and if they are interested about a ‘faith – change’ then they can research and ask people as to how to go about it. However to me, a non religious person, when people preach at me, I find it imposing and annoying because it feels uneasy and forceful.In my experiences relating to religion I have realised that many people try to impose culture as religion in order to give their thoughts credibility, such as their thoughts over gender or social values.
My Response -
I agree that preaching about religion is wrong. People are born with a faith and if they don't like it they will take that step into finding one they do like. If you believe in something this is fine but don't push it onto people that are trying to do their shopping. Religion is a good thing. I also have respect for people who have alot of faith, i sometimes wish i had more. People are all different and what they choose to believe in is their choice
I think most people think like this but the extremists go to far.There is no need to stand in a shopping center and force people to lisen to you. If they really wanted to join that religion they woulnd find out about it by themselves. I have noticed conversion is on the up as of late but i'm sure that is a result of people taking that step themselves, and not being forced.
Personally I am not a religious person, however I respect that other people are deeply religious, which is fine. However I don’t agree with preaching in streets and town, because in today’s society everybody is aware of the different religions and if they are interested about a ‘faith – change’ then they can research and ask people as to how to go about it. However to me, a non religious person, when people preach at me, I find it imposing and annoying because it feels uneasy and forceful.In my experiences relating to religion I have realised that many people try to impose culture as religion in order to give their thoughts credibility, such as their thoughts over gender or social values.
My Response -
I agree that preaching about religion is wrong. People are born with a faith and if they don't like it they will take that step into finding one they do like. If you believe in something this is fine but don't push it onto people that are trying to do their shopping. Religion is a good thing. I also have respect for people who have alot of faith, i sometimes wish i had more. People are all different and what they choose to believe in is their choice
I think most people think like this but the extremists go to far.There is no need to stand in a shopping center and force people to lisen to you. If they really wanted to join that religion they woulnd find out about it by themselves. I have noticed conversion is on the up as of late but i'm sure that is a result of people taking that step themselves, and not being forced.
Bandits And Outlaws
When I hear the words ‘bandits and outlaws’ I immediately think of men on horses running towards a train and robbing it. Or many a sandy piece of paper with the words ‘WANTED’ on it. I guess this is because these words are no longer used to describe criminals today. Bandits and outlaws are usually people who are on the run indefinitely and commit crime after crime without getting caught. Sometimes they are said to be standing up for the little guy too. Lets take Robin Hood for example. He stole from the rich to give to the poor. Now I never really think of Robin Hood as a bandit or outlaw because he is such a well know figure today, but he was. Everyone knows who Robin Hood is though and he is thought of as the good guy. Someone I didn’t know that well was Jesse James. I’d heard his name and saw films with his name in the TV guide without actually watching them, but I never really knew anything about him. Just the fact he was a bandit/outlaw. In the lesson I learned he was a popular American outlaw with a social conscience, he was a bank/train robber and he had the image of standing up for the little guy. He was not a product of the Wild West, he didn’t come from a poor family and he was quite political. I think people like Robin Hood, who did bad things for good reasons, do have a danger of glamorising criminal behaviour. I guess it depends how bad the thing is that the person is doing to help the poor. Stealing is very different from killing for example. Villains become heroes when they do something the public approve of. This shows it is possible for a bad guy to be a good guy if he has the right intentions.
Heres a great link for info about bandits and outlaws - http://www.legendsofamerica.com/WE-Outlaws.html
Heres a great link for info about bandits and outlaws - http://www.legendsofamerica.com/WE-Outlaws.html
Wednesday 25 April 2007
Lying with integrity
Lying is always seen a wrong. Even when it is used with good intentions like when mothers lie to children about Father Christmas. This was discussed in class and while some thought it was okay to lie to kids about Santa others thought it was wrong because of the disappointment they would suffer when they found out the truth. But why do people lie? Everybody lies. Whether it is a little white lie or a hugely dishonest one – we all do it. Why? I don’t really know. People usually lie in situations so they don’t get in trouble. Unless you’re lying for someone lying is usually something only beneficial to you. You lie because you have something to gain. If you are telling a lie, like for example you cheated on your partner but you say you didn’t, I think it all comes down to respect. The backbone of it is you don’t have enough respect for that person to tell the truth.
However lying is used in everyday life. It isn’t just used in very serious situations.
When you play a prank on someone you’re lying to them.
When you’re off in your own world and your friend is talking to you and you nod and say ‘I’m listening’ - you’re lying to them.
It’s as common as anything. Sometimes it’s essential. A scene in the film ‘Liar Lair’ illustrates this point well. There’s a scene where the main protagonist is asked if he likes his boss. Like most people he doesn’t but then he is put in a situation where he is asked in front of his boss what he thinks of him. Not being able to lie he tells the boss exactly what he really thinks of him and it is not too polite. But in real life you have to lie in a situation like this to keep your job. You can’t just sit there with a man that can make or break your career and say ‘well actually I think you’re quite a loser’
When it comes down to it lying it something everyone does and always will do. Sometimes it’s so natural it’s a reflex. It would be nice to live in a world where nobody lies but it isn’t going to happen. I don’t think lying is good because it always comes back to bite you in the bottom. You either get caught out or the guilt makes you throw up. It’s best to be honest because once you tell one lie, and have to keep it going, it becomes a full time job.
However lying is used in everyday life. It isn’t just used in very serious situations.
When you play a prank on someone you’re lying to them.
When you’re off in your own world and your friend is talking to you and you nod and say ‘I’m listening’ - you’re lying to them.
It’s as common as anything. Sometimes it’s essential. A scene in the film ‘Liar Lair’ illustrates this point well. There’s a scene where the main protagonist is asked if he likes his boss. Like most people he doesn’t but then he is put in a situation where he is asked in front of his boss what he thinks of him. Not being able to lie he tells the boss exactly what he really thinks of him and it is not too polite. But in real life you have to lie in a situation like this to keep your job. You can’t just sit there with a man that can make or break your career and say ‘well actually I think you’re quite a loser’
When it comes down to it lying it something everyone does and always will do. Sometimes it’s so natural it’s a reflex. It would be nice to live in a world where nobody lies but it isn’t going to happen. I don’t think lying is good because it always comes back to bite you in the bottom. You either get caught out or the guilt makes you throw up. It’s best to be honest because once you tell one lie, and have to keep it going, it becomes a full time job.
Heres a site that tells you the 7 signs yo wheather a person is lying to you - http://www.sixwise.com/newsletters/05/06/29/the_top_seven_signs_that_someone_is_lying_to_you.htm
Monday 23 April 2007
Reply To Mark Preston
What Mark Said -
Starting the lecture with a prayer was certainly a good way of grabbing the attention of the audience, whether they approved of it or not. The prayer itself was also very specific, excluding all faiths but Christianity and mentioning men being the ‘knowledge seekers’ it made many people feel uncomfortable, segregated even annoyed. The reason for this soon became apparent as George explained the main topic behind the lecture was to test peoples reactions to religion and see if there was a point in which a person became ‘too religious’. The lecture itself turned out to be highly interesting, looking into various sections of religion including cults and the overall role of the church.
My Response-
Yes i agree starting the lecture with a prayer was a bit of a shock. To be honest i didn't know how to feel. Some people got angry becasue they felt they were forced to pray but because i was so suprised i didn't have time to form any other emotions. And i agree with what you picked up on about the pray only being concerned with Christians. That was highly unusual in such a multicultural society. It was a good tactic to get a reaction out of us though. I agree it was a intertesting lecture. It was thought provoking.
Starting the lecture with a prayer was certainly a good way of grabbing the attention of the audience, whether they approved of it or not. The prayer itself was also very specific, excluding all faiths but Christianity and mentioning men being the ‘knowledge seekers’ it made many people feel uncomfortable, segregated even annoyed. The reason for this soon became apparent as George explained the main topic behind the lecture was to test peoples reactions to religion and see if there was a point in which a person became ‘too religious’. The lecture itself turned out to be highly interesting, looking into various sections of religion including cults and the overall role of the church.
My Response-
Yes i agree starting the lecture with a prayer was a bit of a shock. To be honest i didn't know how to feel. Some people got angry becasue they felt they were forced to pray but because i was so suprised i didn't have time to form any other emotions. And i agree with what you picked up on about the pray only being concerned with Christians. That was highly unusual in such a multicultural society. It was a good tactic to get a reaction out of us though. I agree it was a intertesting lecture. It was thought provoking.
Reply to Megan Hellowell
What Megan said -
The week two discussion was all about smoking, which in all honesty isn't something I know much about. When asked to write down my own experiences with smoking, all I could think of was:Er... I've never smoked. My mum used to, but she gave up before I was born, and my nan gave up when my dad died.That was it. Not "I tried it once and saw a giant purple fox, then figured I'd best not do it again", I've never tried it. I guess it just doesn't appeal to me. I think it scares me slightly that my dad didn't really smoke or drink and had a heart attack and died at the age of 47, so I don't wish to give myself even LESS of a chance by smoking.I can't say it bothers me if people smoke, I'd rather they didn't, but at the end of the day it's their choice.Also, glancing over my notes just now, when asked what "cool" was, I appear to have written:COOL = SLASHin big letters at the top of the page. Hmmm... That'd make me a good anti-smoking campaigner... Has Slash (if you don't know who Slash is, you must DIE. Or listen to more Guns N Roses anyway) ever been seen without a cigarette hanging out of the corner of his mouth as he plays? If he has, I've not seen it. Not that that's what makes him cool, but you know what I mean. Just look at him!Look me in the eye and tell me that's not cool personified!Anyway, smoking, wasn't it? Got kinda... distracted... by Slash there...I can't think of much more I can say, not being a smoker and not having a strong opinion on it... Um... What about the smoking in public places ban? Good or bad? I can imagine you can ask someone if they smoke or not and automatically know what their opinion is from that, can't you really? I was always anti-smoking when I was younger, I think it was drilled into my brain by my family, none of them really smoking since before I was born, apart from my nan, who gave up when I was 11, but I think as time's gone on I've sort of given up caring. If people want to smoke themselves to death, let them do it. As long as they enjoy themselves doing it, you can't really judge them. It's like saying people can't eat chocolate cos one day it MAY give you cancer. You can't live in fear of what MAY happen. Well, you can, but if you do, I'm fairly sure you'll die pretty young, as EVERYTHING is bad for you now... Oh well.
My Response -
Yes firstly i agree about Slash looking effortlessly cool with a cigarette in his mouth. You did go off on a tangent about him but you are forgiven as he does rock.But he IS sending out a bad image that smoking is cool (even if he doesn't mean to) when it is not. I also agree with what you said about it being people's choice wheather they want to smoke becasue the warnings are EVERYWHERE that it is bad for you and will kill you - but people do not lisen. Like you said i had it drilled into my brain when i was young that smoking was bad for you. I have ashma though (did i spell that wrong, don't even know my own problem!) so smoking was a big no no anyway. I don't like smoking though so even if i was healthy as a horse i would still not smoke. What's the point? xx
The week two discussion was all about smoking, which in all honesty isn't something I know much about. When asked to write down my own experiences with smoking, all I could think of was:Er... I've never smoked. My mum used to, but she gave up before I was born, and my nan gave up when my dad died.That was it. Not "I tried it once and saw a giant purple fox, then figured I'd best not do it again", I've never tried it. I guess it just doesn't appeal to me. I think it scares me slightly that my dad didn't really smoke or drink and had a heart attack and died at the age of 47, so I don't wish to give myself even LESS of a chance by smoking.I can't say it bothers me if people smoke, I'd rather they didn't, but at the end of the day it's their choice.Also, glancing over my notes just now, when asked what "cool" was, I appear to have written:COOL = SLASHin big letters at the top of the page. Hmmm... That'd make me a good anti-smoking campaigner... Has Slash (if you don't know who Slash is, you must DIE. Or listen to more Guns N Roses anyway) ever been seen without a cigarette hanging out of the corner of his mouth as he plays? If he has, I've not seen it. Not that that's what makes him cool, but you know what I mean. Just look at him!Look me in the eye and tell me that's not cool personified!Anyway, smoking, wasn't it? Got kinda... distracted... by Slash there...I can't think of much more I can say, not being a smoker and not having a strong opinion on it... Um... What about the smoking in public places ban? Good or bad? I can imagine you can ask someone if they smoke or not and automatically know what their opinion is from that, can't you really? I was always anti-smoking when I was younger, I think it was drilled into my brain by my family, none of them really smoking since before I was born, apart from my nan, who gave up when I was 11, but I think as time's gone on I've sort of given up caring. If people want to smoke themselves to death, let them do it. As long as they enjoy themselves doing it, you can't really judge them. It's like saying people can't eat chocolate cos one day it MAY give you cancer. You can't live in fear of what MAY happen. Well, you can, but if you do, I'm fairly sure you'll die pretty young, as EVERYTHING is bad for you now... Oh well.
My Response -
Yes firstly i agree about Slash looking effortlessly cool with a cigarette in his mouth. You did go off on a tangent about him but you are forgiven as he does rock.But he IS sending out a bad image that smoking is cool (even if he doesn't mean to) when it is not. I also agree with what you said about it being people's choice wheather they want to smoke becasue the warnings are EVERYWHERE that it is bad for you and will kill you - but people do not lisen. Like you said i had it drilled into my brain when i was young that smoking was bad for you. I have ashma though (did i spell that wrong, don't even know my own problem!) so smoking was a big no no anyway. I don't like smoking though so even if i was healthy as a horse i would still not smoke. What's the point? xx
The internet
Now we all think the internet is a wonderful thing, but is it? It certainly makes life easier for businesses and school work. Information is avaliable easily and anyone can access it.
Problems start to arise when people take advantage of the internet. For example some people use it for scams or to harm others. In the news recently there was a story of a young girl who went into one of those chat rooms and 'fell in love' with this guy in America. So thinking all was nice and fine she arrangd to meet him when he was in England on holiday and...he turned out to be a horrible dirty old man. Now i'm not saying all people on the internet do this but it is incredible how much the internet has affected us.
In this university the internet is used alot. Now people like me hate this as i do not have access to the internet at home so it's a real pain, but alot love it. It's even got to the point where pen and paper are becoming redudant. Forshame.
I'm not against the internet - i love it - i just think it is way to relyed on in this day and age. And as i write this (on the internet) i wonder what do you think? You see - we're not discussing topics in class face to face - it's all on the computer. Ah the digital age
This is a good site if you need help with the net. It has lots of useful links. - http://www.refdesk.com/help.html
This is a good site for internet safety. Especially if you have chidren - http://www.kidshealth.org/parent/positive/family/net_safety.html
Monday 16 April 2007
The Demon Drink
So fancy a drink?As we covered smoking quite early on in the being bad topic I thought it appropriate to mention its best friend. Drink. Now I admit I do drink and so do a lot of people I know, but I don’t really drink that often. I don’t sit at home shaking with a bottle in one hand and a shotgun in the other. No. I mostly drink when I go out with mates. It’s the only time it’s necessary for me. Go out and get pissed.
Now I’ve never know anyone who had a drink problem, but when I see it in the media it’s usually connected to escapism and the old saying ‘the answer to life’s problems aren’t at the bottom of a bottle’ (insert the correct saying I know that’s a bit messed). Advertisements for drink awareness have been getting darker as the years have gone on. Especially for drink driving. The makers have mainly tried to get their point across by really showing the reality of what can happen if you drink and drive, and this mainly involves showing the blood. These adverts may be hard to watch but I think they are necessary to get the point across. There was also one about ‘drinking to much alcohol can make you feel invincible’ and I think that one was realty hard hitting too. In my opinion I think drinking is okay as long as it’s in moderation. I don’t practically enjoy it when people get really plastered. (Mainly because I’m the one holding their hair back as they hurl) but that much drink is not needed to have a good time. Think of your liver!!!!!!
Here's a good site to keep you drink aware - http://www.drinkaware.co.uk/
Friday 30 March 2007
Kids?!
We were asked in the lecture if we think this film was shocking. Well…yes. I must say though I wasn’t as shocked as maybe I should have been. When the film first came out I think it would have been a lot more shocking to audiences than it is now. This is mainly because excessive drug taking, sex etc are quite common in films featuring teenagers. I suppose the thing that shocked me the most was the age range of characters – or how old they were depicted anyway. Watching the four male children smoking drugs was unconformable watching for me. I guess this is because I have a younger sister and I couldn’t imagine kids her age behaving in this manner. I don’t agree with this kind of behaviour even in films because those kids were not over the age of consent (he said they al were but just depicted as not) and they were still doing it.
I obviously didn’t like the main character because he treated girls like crap and he had AIDS! It was an important message though. I just find it crazy that these girls didn’t know that if a guy asks you to sleep with him on the first date he obviously doesn’t care about you. I guess that was a message. The girl diagnosed with Aids went on a journey in the film that I think the audience could relate to because of the sympathy we feel for her. All her mates were sleeping around and yet she does it once and she gets aids.
It was a thought provoking film but it would have been nice to see a better ending with maybe her telling Telle about the aids. It seemed to build up and then just stop. It didn’t really go anywhere. It was more like a documentary because there was no plot with beginning middle end. It was just following people around.
I obviously didn’t like the main character because he treated girls like crap and he had AIDS! It was an important message though. I just find it crazy that these girls didn’t know that if a guy asks you to sleep with him on the first date he obviously doesn’t care about you. I guess that was a message. The girl diagnosed with Aids went on a journey in the film that I think the audience could relate to because of the sympathy we feel for her. All her mates were sleeping around and yet she does it once and she gets aids.
It was a thought provoking film but it would have been nice to see a better ending with maybe her telling Telle about the aids. It seemed to build up and then just stop. It didn’t really go anywhere. It was more like a documentary because there was no plot with beginning middle end. It was just following people around.
Heres a link that gives you some info on the film - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113540/
Friday 2 March 2007
Field trip?
Well what have we been doing so far?? Smoking, Stealing, masturbation,Infidelity .... I'm thinking some sort of trip to LA where they make all those Naughty movies...just kidding.
umm... I don't know....Mars. We should have a practical field trip or something. Something we can all enjoy. I'll have to get back to you.
umm... I don't know....Mars. We should have a practical field trip or something. Something we can all enjoy. I'll have to get back to you.
Infidelity
All I can say is – it is not okay to cheat on someone. If you are in a relationship you should be 100% committed no matter what. I mean everyone finds people attractive even if they are in a relationship, but you shouldn’t act upon it! You obviously think the person you are with is pretty great to be going out with them in the first place, so that is what you must remember if you are tempted. I don’t know if I’m just being terribly old fashioned (I am all of 19 years old) but that is just the way it should be.
If you’re in an open relationship then that’s a different story because that means you are both agreeing to it. I can’t think what kind of original relationship you must have if you need to go to others to be satisfied but there you go.
I define cheating as doing it behind your partners back (not literally of course - that’s just crossing a line) and that involves lying, selfishness and scheming. How can you look your partner in the eye when you’ve been with another behind their back? I couldn’t do it. I’m awfully honest though. It’s just such a horrible thing to do if you do cheat. I mean if you’re unhappy then leave that person and pursue the next – don’t have that ‘cake’ and eat it! A relationship is a two way street – a compromise - and if you’re a person that only thinks of themselves then you shouldn’t be in one.
Heres a helpful site if you've been a victim of infidelity - http://www.infidelity.com/
If you’re in an open relationship then that’s a different story because that means you are both agreeing to it. I can’t think what kind of original relationship you must have if you need to go to others to be satisfied but there you go.
I define cheating as doing it behind your partners back (not literally of course - that’s just crossing a line) and that involves lying, selfishness and scheming. How can you look your partner in the eye when you’ve been with another behind their back? I couldn’t do it. I’m awfully honest though. It’s just such a horrible thing to do if you do cheat. I mean if you’re unhappy then leave that person and pursue the next – don’t have that ‘cake’ and eat it! A relationship is a two way street – a compromise - and if you’re a person that only thinks of themselves then you shouldn’t be in one.
Heres a helpful site if you've been a victim of infidelity - http://www.infidelity.com/
Friday 23 February 2007
That Thing No One Likes To Talk About
Well well well week four was certainly a education. Masturbation. Ahh dosen't that feel better to say it without cringing and falling into that black hole next to you. I have to say though, something i learned was the amount of names for the subject in question. So - many - names. It was an interesting subject thuogh.
I never would have thought I’d be writing this at uni but life is full of surprises.
What I found interesting about the whole thing was how scared we are to talk about it. (Well actually people seemed quite at home discussing their dirty habits didn’t they?) It is a huge taboo in the media though. I think it was almost unheard of in the public eye a few years ago, and now it’s heard quite often in comedy shows and things like that. Although that is still reducing it to ridicule – is it okay because we are laughing about it and not talking it serious? Maybe. However behind closed doors it is an unspoken common occurrence so everybody is aware of it at least. It’s something people don’t like to talk about but are happy to do alone. Why do people get embarrassed though? I mean I was laughing in the lecture, but when we had to fill in that paper it was embarrassing wasn’t it? It seems to just be human nature. Maybe because it’s seen as ‘sad’ to be at home alone and giving yourself one? I coulnd't really explain it.
Men do seem more prone to it though, and they seem to find it easier to talk about. Funny that.
Has anyone watched Ricky Gervais 'Politics'? When he says his friend was doing this and when he opened his eyes he saw his mum had walked in and left him tea and biscuits??? Oh the Shame.
I never would have thought I’d be writing this at uni but life is full of surprises.
What I found interesting about the whole thing was how scared we are to talk about it. (Well actually people seemed quite at home discussing their dirty habits didn’t they?) It is a huge taboo in the media though. I think it was almost unheard of in the public eye a few years ago, and now it’s heard quite often in comedy shows and things like that. Although that is still reducing it to ridicule – is it okay because we are laughing about it and not talking it serious? Maybe. However behind closed doors it is an unspoken common occurrence so everybody is aware of it at least. It’s something people don’t like to talk about but are happy to do alone. Why do people get embarrassed though? I mean I was laughing in the lecture, but when we had to fill in that paper it was embarrassing wasn’t it? It seems to just be human nature. Maybe because it’s seen as ‘sad’ to be at home alone and giving yourself one? I coulnd't really explain it.
Men do seem more prone to it though, and they seem to find it easier to talk about. Funny that.
Has anyone watched Ricky Gervais 'Politics'? When he says his friend was doing this and when he opened his eyes he saw his mum had walked in and left him tea and biscuits??? Oh the Shame.
Thursday 15 February 2007
Being Bad Week Three
After watching Family Guy my views on shoplifting are - It is no different to any other theft. Stealing is stealing no matter what it is. you are still taking something that is not yours and that is bad no matter how big or small it is.
I think people who can afford things shoplift because it gives them a rush. Doing something that you are not supposed to do and not getting caught gives some people excitment and just that feeling of grabbing that book, or whatever, and managing to get out of the shop unnoticed is a feeling of high. I think they like the fact they are 'getting one over' on someone.
After watching breakfast at Tiffinays - I do not think it is prostitution to take money from someone who is expecting sex. It's more conning than anything else. She has conned that man into thinking he will have sex with her and he is a fool for falling for it. She is more a con artist than a prostitute.
On the subject of if it is more or less socially respectable i think it is less because she is taking advanatge of someone and that is always frowned upon.
Resonable charge - I say if you can get away with it take as much as you can get. If she has to endure this guy leering at her she might as well get handsomely paid.
After watching Peep Show - Stalking - A interest in someone turns into stalking when that person starts to obsess over someone in a unhealthy manner. This is following them, being always where they are, getting paranoid, asking univted questions and bothering them. These people can only think about the other person and it forces them to have this want to always be near them hence the stalking. (p.s if this sounds familiar change your lifestlye.)
I think people who can afford things shoplift because it gives them a rush. Doing something that you are not supposed to do and not getting caught gives some people excitment and just that feeling of grabbing that book, or whatever, and managing to get out of the shop unnoticed is a feeling of high. I think they like the fact they are 'getting one over' on someone.
After watching breakfast at Tiffinays - I do not think it is prostitution to take money from someone who is expecting sex. It's more conning than anything else. She has conned that man into thinking he will have sex with her and he is a fool for falling for it. She is more a con artist than a prostitute.
On the subject of if it is more or less socially respectable i think it is less because she is taking advanatge of someone and that is always frowned upon.
Resonable charge - I say if you can get away with it take as much as you can get. If she has to endure this guy leering at her she might as well get handsomely paid.
After watching Peep Show - Stalking - A interest in someone turns into stalking when that person starts to obsess over someone in a unhealthy manner. This is following them, being always where they are, getting paranoid, asking univted questions and bothering them. These people can only think about the other person and it forces them to have this want to always be near them hence the stalking. (p.s if this sounds familiar change your lifestlye.)
Here's good site to help you stop stealing - http://www.kidshealth.org/kid/health_problems/learning_problem/stealing.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)